PG&E Bankruptcy Update
Bankruptcy moves all fire lawsuits under the federal court overseeing the bankruptcy. The Trustee overseeing administration of the bankruptcy will be responsible for assigning committees for wildfire claimants and the other creditors owed money by PG&E. These committees will represent the interests of their constituent creditors throughout the bankruptcy proceedings. Your claims will not go away, but they will be taken into consideration alongside those of other significant creditor groups, like PG&E bondholders.
Given the complexity and scope of the fire claims against PG&E, we are working diligently on a plan to administer these claims from a pool of funds. We are working with leadership in the fire cases and skilled bankruptcy lawyers to establish a FIRE VICTIMS CREDITORS COMMITTEE. If such a plan is proposed, each individual claimant will have an opportunity to vote up or down on the proposal. If enough claimants vote for the proposal, the plan will be adopted, and we could have a much shorter road towards recovery. No matter what course the case follows, we will be sure to keep you informed about what is happening and how the unfolding events will impact you.
In the meantime, there are many potential turns the bankruptcy case could take, given the broad powers that the U.S. District Court will have to conduct the bankruptcy proceedings. The Court may hold hearings similar to a civil trial in order to evaluate PG&E’s legal culpability for some or all of the fires. The Court may order additional mediation between the creditor committees and PG&E. The Court could even associate the bankruptcy proceeding with the ongoing criminal probe in federal court.
What we do know is that it is very likely that the Court will authorize a “bar date,” which is a deadline for claimants to file a proof of claim in bankruptcy court. If someone who has suffered losses as a result of a PG&E-caused fire does not file a proof of claim by that date, their rights to recovery for their injuries could be in jeopardy.
For the fire claimants who already have a competent attorney, this is not a major concern. However, for those of your neighbors and loved ones who have been sitting on the sidelines, waiting for news from Cal Fire, keeping an eye on the two-year statute of limitations, or just trying to get their feet under them, now would be a good time to consider retaining a trusted law firm.
Tubbs Fire Investigation
Cal Fire investigators have issued their findings that PG&E infrastructure (poles, wires, fuses, etc.) was not the originating cause of the Tubbs Fire. You may have seen us discussing these issues on TV or in the newspapers. As we have commented on many prior occasions, Cal Fire’s findings and investigative reports are not admissible as evidence in any civil action. The interviews conducted with witnesses, the collection of evidence, and the expert analysis carried out by Cal Fire all may be instructive as we move forward. However, the Cal Fire report itself is neither admissible as evidence nor binding on the court.
The Cal Fire report is eighty pages long. It raises a number of questions that are not answered; however, it does suggest that it was not a PG&E-owned wire that may have touched off the Tubbs fire.
We do not believe the question of who owned the wire is the critical inquiry. Our experts have never seen the Tubbs evidence because Cal Fire has not made it accessible. Regardless of the Cal Fire findings, we believe that PG&E still has responsibility for failing to adopt policies and procedures that would have shut down power proactively given the red flag conditions on the ground in Calistoga that night. These policies and procedures have been adopted with great success in San Diego, and what we know is that these changes would have prevented electrical equipment, regardless of its owner, from starting this fire.
We remain committed to our pursuit of a separate and independent basis for liability against PG&E for the Tubbs Fire, and this report does not change that. To the extent that the cause and origin of the Tubbs fire must be litigated in the bankruptcy court, the evidence and proof will not include direct submission of this report. We remain confident that, when all of the evidence is unearthed and all of the expert testimony is presented, it will be shown that the acts and omissions of PG&E management were responsible, as defined under the law, for causing the Tubbs Fire and its devastation
Unethical Conduct Alert
Over the last forty-eight hours, we have learned that many so-called “advertising” law firms throughout Sonoma and Napa have intensified efforts to sign up clients. Their methods and messages are neither ethical nor honest. Law firms are “cold calling” unrepresented clients and trying to prey upon fears of the Tubbs announcement by suggesting that cases must be filed before bankruptcy (this is not true), declaring that cases must be filed to challenge the Cal Fire determination immediately (not true), or making other statements that engender fear and suggest that clients need to change lawyers in light of the impending bankruptcy, file paperwork, or do other things that are simply not required by law.
We are embarrassed that this is occurring and disappointed that members of the bar would do these things. If you receive a cold call or other solicitation that includes misrepresentations, we recommend that you report the caller to the State Bar of California immediately. The number to call is 800-843-9053.
We have also heard from clients that hedge funds, and claims purchasers have appeared on the horizon with the announcement of the bankruptcy. These predators are circling in attempts to take advantage of victims who are short on cash or who may be anxious about recovery in bankruptcy.
Even with the bankruptcy being filed, we believe we will be successful in obtaining recovery on behalf of our clients. But these hedge funds and claim purchasers know that people are worried, and they want to cash in on this fear. They are looking to buy claims at twenty or thirty cents on the dollar. This is not a good bargain. We have seen letters and emails from settlement advance companies and other entities that want to “immediately purchase fire claims” from attorneys who are handling these cases. When attorneys refuse to make these deals, the next step is always to violate ethical rules and go directly to both unrepresented and represented clients with these dishonest, fearmongering tactics.
The same is true for predatory lenders who may contact you offering to loan you money against your bankruptcy recovery. The usurious interest rates and other unfavorable conditions of these loans make them uniformly bad for the borrower (i.e., you).
The unfortunate reality is that bankruptcy tends to attract these predatory finance companies and law firms, and they recognize that there are many wildfire claimants who are suffering. If you receive these kinds of letters or inquiries, please let us know. You should let anyone who contacts you know that you are already represented by counsel, and if you have friends, neighbors, or acquaintances who are not represented—particularly any who are seriously considering these kinds of offers—let them know that they can contact us for free information and advice about the potential negative consequences. We can answer questions about the bankruptcy process, share what we expect the value of claims to be, and give real-life examples of how these claims purchasers or loan sharks have taken advantage of clients in other cases in bankruptcy.
The silver lining is that Wall Street finance experts would not be buying these claims unless they thought the claims had value—and whatever they are paying for the claims is less than they think they can ultimately get out of the bankruptcy. The question is, how badly are they underpaying? The answer is typically by as much as 30 to 50 percent.
If you have questions about this kind of solicitation, please contact us at (415) 981-7210 or send us an email. We will be happy to answer any questions.
Four Top California Law Firms Begin Filing Series of Lawsuits On Behalf of Camp Fire Victims and Challenge PG&E’s False and Misleading Ads Touting Their Concern for Customer Safety
This is the first and only case filed that directly challenges PG&E for misleading over 16 million customers that safety is its first priority. Two different complaints filed today in Butte County Superior Court seek to compensate victims and recoup monies spent by the utility giant for misleading advertising expenditures.
“After the tragedy of October 2017 in wine country, we watched PG&E blanket the airwaves on a daily basis for 14 months advertising that they were interested in the safety of their customers and the prevention of wildfires. All of that money spent on advertising should have been spent on prevention.”
– Mike Kelly of Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger
CPUC Chief Not Concerned Over PG&E Financial Condition
Speaking to the Sacramento Bee on November 14, California Public Utilities Commission president, Michael Picker, said he does not believe Pacific Gas & Electric is headed toward bankruptcy, despite the threat of billions of dollars in liability from wildfires.
He acknowledged that PG&E’s growing liabilities are a concern and that the state should take additional steps to ensure the utility has continued borrowing ability to permit it to satisfy its debts arising from wildfire losses in both 2017 and 2018.
He said that he has been on conference calls in the last week with utility investors and executives, conveying the message that the PUC and state legislature are working to maintain the utility company’s financial stability. He characterized bankruptcy as “a news media preoccupation.” He acknowledged that PG&E could file for bankruptcy at some point, but thought that was not “something immediate.”
In the short term Picker suggested that the current priority should be to help PG&E access low-cost borrowing because its borrowing costs affect ratepayers, saying as the cost of borrowing goes up so do people’s rates.
PG&E’s stock prices have been up and down since the Camp Fire started.
The state Legislature moved this summer to improve PG&E’s financial position by allowing it to borrow money to pay expenses from 2017 fires, and to pass some of those costs on to its customers. The new law also sets up a process to let PG&E pass fire-related costs to consumers for fires sparked after Jan. 1 2019, but doesn’t apply to 2018 fires.
There is ongoing discussion about the potential ability of the PUC to include 2018 fires when it considers any PG&E requests for rate adjustments. The CPUC. is one of the government agencies tasked with ensuring that investor-owned utilities operate a safe and reliable grid.
On Thursday November 15, Bank of America Merrill Lynch held an hour-long call for investment clients in which Mr. Picker took part. Praful Mehta, a Citigroup analyst, whose estimates of PG&E liability have been widely cited, said the CPUC’s unusually aggressive effort to show support for the utility indicated the commission’s confidence that other state authorities backed its position. “It was pretty clear that the CPUC statements drove this recovery,” Mr. Mehta said. “I would say that I think the CPUC would not make such bold statements of support without having some form of blessing to back up their statement.”
Questions remain, however, about PG&E’s board and management as an obstacle to reform and improvement of the utilities safety culture. According to Mr. Picker, the CPUC is broadening an ongoing review of safety at the company to examine “the corporate governance, structure, and operation of PG&E, including in light of the recent wildfires, to determine the best path forward.” Chairman Picker has said that the examination will include looking closely at the company’s board. Six of the utility’s 12 board members have been in place since before the fatal 2010 San Bruno natural gas pipeline explosion in the San Francisco Bay Area. “That’s not a strong message of accountability to the rest of the organization,” Picker said.
CPUC Chair, Picker, stressed he does not want to drive the company into bankruptcy. Any changes, he said, would need to be made carefully and he stressed patience. In an interview reported online, Picker is reported to have commented: “This is like rebuilding the plane while it’s still in flight — you don’t want to crash the plane while you’re trying to make it safer.”
Camp Fire Legal Update:
In less than six days the Camp Fire, in Butte County, became one of the most deadly and destructive electrically triggered wild fires in California history. Based upon preliminary information, including reports filed by PG&E, it appears that the fire started early on Thursday, November 8, 2017, east of Paradise, California. The number of dead has reached at least 42. As of November 12, there were still 200 people unaccounted for. The fire also displaced individuals and families from more than 6000 homes. The fire incinerated homes, apartments, storage facilities, businesses, hospitals, government buildings, crops and forest land. In the first five days of its existence, the fire burned over 113,000 acres and destroyed over 6,700 structures.
The origin point for the Camp Fire is in the general area of Camp Creek and Pulgas Road, on the northern hillside above the Poe Dam near Highway 70.
The illustration below shows the approximate origin point of the fire, and the perimeter of the fire and its vast scope as of November 12, 2018.
Fig. 1. Map of Camp Fire.
PG&E and the Cause of the Fire:
PG&E is already under investigation by the California Public Utilities Commission for their involvement in the origination of this tragic blaze. The Camp Fire started before 6:30 a.m. on Thursday, November 8, 2018. At 6:15 a.m. that morning, PG&E detected a line outage on a 115kV Transmission line above the Poe Dam in Butte County. A subsequent aerial patrol confirmed damage to a PG&E transmission tower on the line roughly one mile north-east of the town of Pulga.
Fire crews were dispatched at 6:33 a.m., and had eyes on the scene by 6:43 a.m. First responders confirmed that power lines were down.
These line outages occurred during a Red Flag event for Butte County. PG&E had already issued multiple alerts that power could be proactively turned off for safety between November 8th and November 9th due to red flag conditions including strong winds and dangerously low humidity. Inexplicably, no power shutdown took place.
Fig. 2. Approximate Origin Point Of Camp Fire
The Walkup Melodia Fire Team Is Involved In The Investigation Of The Camp Fire
When selecting a law firm to represent yourself and your family, you should choose a firm with experience, integrity and track record of success. The Walkup utility-caused wild fire trial team has all those qualities.
Individual team members of the Walkup law firm have close ties to Butte County, with firm family members and friends that have sustained fire related losses. We understand the issues that are confronting survivors including shock, vulnerability, emotional distress, loss of priceless personal property, loss of homes and businesses.
Walkup has litigated against PG&E for more than 50 years. Senior partner Michael Kelly is one of three lead co-counsel firms appointed to oversee and manage the Northern California wine country fire litigation related to the wildfires that swept through Sonoma and Napa Counties in October 2017, putting the Walkup Melodia team of fire lawyers at forefront of that major fire litigation. We represent more than 200 households and businesses. We understand the issues involved in utility-caused electrical fires.
Contact us for a free initial consultation. We can explain your rights, and answer your questions. Talk to lawyers who are interested in you and your welfare. We are concerned about our clients and have structured our contingent legal fees to be lower than the majority of other firms. We understand the special relationship between attorney and client, and that for many clients the emotional distress that they have suffered as a result of their fire losses is more significant than any property losses. This is an especially traumatic stressful time for those who have lost homes, possessions, jobs, and pets. We are here to help put our clients lives back together piece by piece.
If we cannot help you, or if we do not feel that you have a case we will tell you that. We will not file claims that do not have merit and we will not file claims on behalf of clients we do not believe will benefit from legal representation. Our ultimate goal is to try and restore our clients lives back to the condition they were in on November 7, 2018.
We understand how insurers think. We understand how to maximize your recovery.
Contact our firm at (415) 889-2919 or send us an email for a free consultation with an attorney experienced in fire injury litigation.
Resources & Giving:
United Policy Holders – Camp Fire Insurance Claim Help
A California-based non-profit organization, United Policy Holders responds in times of crisis and major disasters. They have developed a comprehensive Roadmap to Recovery to assist fire victims with first steps and long term guidance through the process of navigating the insurance process.
Caring Choices – Emergency Volunteer Center (Chico)
Caring Choices is the designated Butte County Emergency Volunteer Center (EVC) for Camp Fire. They process, vet, and deploy volunteers in response to community official requests.
Investigation of PG&E Liability in “Camp” Wildfire, Paradise, Butte County, CA
“Camp” Fire Wrongful Death Claims
The Walkup Melodia team of fire lawyers is presently involved in the investigation of wrongful death cases against PG&E for the tragic loss of life that occurred in the November 2018 “Camp Fire” that occurred as a result of a PG&E transmission line malfunction, causing widespread devastation throughout Butte County, and devastating city of Paradise together with more than 100,000 surrounding acres. The intense heat of the flames has made it extremely difficult to identify all of those who lost their lives. Many families remain traumatized by the anxiety of not knowing if their loved ones are alive or dead. Sheriff’s deputies and officials from the coroner’s office have been searching charred homes and vehicles that that have been too hot for body-sniffing dogs.
As of the writing of this post, authorities have received more than 500 calls about friends and family members who are missing. Fortunately, over 100 missing persons have been located – but many are still unaccounted for. In cases in which missing people are not found alive, some families have been asked to provide a DNA samples to help identify the remains, in some cases from bone fragments.
The fire litigation team at Walkup Melodia is available to consult with the victims of the Camp Fire and Paradise tragedy at no charge. Potential clients and surviving family members who want to know their legal rights or discuss the filing and prosecution of a wrongful death claim as a result of a life lost due to PG&E’s negligence, should call us at 415-981-7210.
Wrongful Death in Utility-Caused Wildfire
Wrongful death and personal injury claims arising out of utility-caused wildfires are different from property damage claims. Where only property damages are claimed, the injured party can rely upon inverse condemnation and nuisance, two paths to recovery that don’t require the actual proof of a failure to act with reasonable care. However, wildfire-caused wrongful death claims involve different law: clients who have lost a loved one need lawyers who know how to prove the loss of care, comfort, society, financial support and companionship. The law that governs wrongful death cases is different than the law that applies in property loss cases. The items of recoverable damage are different and the proof of losses are different.
When human lives are lost in utility caused wildfires, or victims suffer burn injuries requiring lengthy and painful treatment, physical injury, those who sustained loss or suffered physical injury need law firms and lawyers who have the specialized training and experience to prosecute and try cases in the area of wrongful death and personal injury. This is because financial recovery for wrongful death and personal injury losses arising out of utility-caused wildfires cannot be based on the theory of inverse condemnation or nuisance. Wrongful death and burn injury claims arising out of utility-caused wildfires must be based on negligence or intentional conduct, and the lawyers who prosecute such claims must have a background in the area of negligence and intentional wrongdoing.
Experience in Wildfire Litigation
The wrongful death lawyers of Walkup, Melodia, Kelly and Schoenberger have been successfully recovering money damages for wrongful death and serious burn injury claims for more than 50 years. We understand the elements of damages, how to prove fire-related wrongful death claims and fire-related personal injury claims. We know the fire cause and origin experts to hire, the economic experts to retain in order to prove financial loss to surviving heirs, the ways to demonstrate a failure of reasonable care on the part of electric utilities.
The lawyers of Walkup, Melodia, Kelly and Schoenberger are currently retained to prosecute more than 20 wrongful death cases arising out of the 2017 North Bay Sonoma/Napa fires and the 2017 Montecito mudslide tragedy, which arose from the deadly Thomas fire.
We are committed to obtaining the maximum amount possible for the survivors of those killed as a result of wildfire-caused injuries.
We know the pain that occurs when a family loses a father, mother, son, daughter, aunt, uncle or grandparent. We have obtained multimillion dollar settlements and verdicts for the loss of family members in wrongful death cases. Our team has achieved successful wrongful death outcomes in mediation, arbitration and jury trials. The Walkup Melodia wrongful death group knows how to prove negligence on the part of utilities that cause death. Call us today for a free consultation at 415-981-7210.
First Bellwether Trial Set In Northern California Wildfire Cases
In a Case Management Order (number four) issued on Friday, November 2, 2018, Judicial Council case management trial judge, Curtis Karnow, issued his decision setting the “Atlas fire” for trial in the fall of 2019. In making his ruling, Judge Karnow wrote:
“Three proposals have been made for the first fire to go to trial: Atlas, Tubbs and Sulfur. There are two competing general interests here: first, the goal is to have a trial which includes a sufficient number of issues such that the verdict in that case will be persuasive for not only the other parties involved in that fire, but also will be seen as strongly predictive of the way issues are likely to be resolved the cases involving other fires……”
PG&E suggests the Tubbs fire. Most plaintiffs groups including plaintiff leadership recommend the Atlas fire. Tubbs is the most complex and wide-ranging case to try. The Tubbs fire may have more points of origin than the Atlas fire, which may exponentially increase the number of pertinent experts needed, and to the extent a plaintiff’s damages were arguably caused by more than one point of ignition, may generate complexities not found in a simpler case. The Cal Fire report is not available for Tubbs, although it is available for the Atlas fire, suggesting that discovery could proceed more expeditiously for the Atlas fire….. Even if there is only one ignition source for Tubbs, the means of ignition for the Tubbs fire appears at this time to be under serious debate, potentially involving both PG&E actions and inactions, as well as those of private parties. For Tubbs, the specific disagreement on who is responsible for the ignition apparently will not relate to the theories presented by other cases. By contrast, the Atlas fire appears at this time to be tree-line contact case with one or at most two points of ignition but in each case with a similar mechanism. This suggests a somewhat simpler causation analysis for the Atlas fire, and one which may be common to the other fires. The Atlas fire includes a very substantial number of parties and structures, which will make it useful as a precedent. We will try the Atlas fire first”
Judge Karnow’s decision to set the Atlas fire for trial first will not impair or negatively affect efforts to do the necessary “discovery” on all the fires involved in the October 2017 inferno. Indeed, whether or when to try and begin settlement talks is entirely up to PG&E. For that reason, we are prepared to participate in “bellwether trials” in all fires if necessary. At the same time, it is hoped that as trial preparations unfold and PG&E internal documents are produced, and depositions of relevant PG&E witnesses and experts are completed, PG&E will adopt a less contentious attitude and decide to discuss case-by-case resolution.
A copy of the entire court order issued by Judge Karnow now is available here. North Bay Fire Cases Order #4
Interestingly, just three days after Judge Karnow’s ruling, in a call with bankers and shareholders, PG&E’s CEO, Geisha Williams, said in a live-streamed quarterly earnings report that the state’s liability policy is “flawed and it needs to be addressed,” repeating a contention she had made previously when PG&E was lobbying the legislature to abolish inverse condemnation liability. Williams ignored discussion of recent changes in California law that were enacted to give PG&E precedent-setting relief, allowing it for the first time to tap ratepayers for a portion of last year’s wildfire costs. Under the new legal rules, the California Public Utilities Commission was ordered to apply a financial “stress test” determining the specific amount PG&E can pay without harming ratepayers or affecting power service. PG&E can then seek to recover any additional amounts it must pay through sales of state-sponsored bonds, which will be repaid by the utility’s customers through charges on their monthly bills.
State Sen. Bill Dodd, a Napa Democrat who co-chaired the wildfire legislation committee, was quoted in the Santa Rosa Press Democrat after Williams’ shareholders presentation as saying: “PG&E needs to be focused on improving the way it operates and meeting its duties under current law, especially newly required wildfire mitigation plans.”
Referring to PG&E’s desire to have inverse condemnation liability eliminated, Dodd continued: “The courts and the Legislature declined to change inverse condemnation this year, and I don’t see why that would be different next year.”
June 8, 2018
Press Conference on Cal Fire Report & PG&E Negligence
In the video below, one of our Wildfire Victim Advocate Consortium partners, Frank Pitre, leads a press conference discussing Friday’s Cal Fire report on the causes of 12 of the 2017 Northern California wildfires and speaks in detail regarding the directly related PG&E negligence.
June 8, 2018
Additional Cal Fire Reports Released – PG&E Blamed for 12 Nor-Cal Wildfires
Cal Fire announced today “after extensive and thorough investigations” that 12 of the Northern California Wildfires were caused by “electric power and distribution lines, conductors and the failure of power poles.” The 12 fires referred to in the report are the Redwood, Sulphur, Cherokee, Blue, Norrbom, Adobe, Partrick, Pythian, Nuns, Pocket, Atlas and “37” Fire in Sonoma County. The report goes into detail regarding the cause of each fire.
Cal Fire investigations will continue and additional reports will be released as they are compiled. The report on the Tubbs Fire, one of the most devastating, is still forthcoming. California state senator, Jerry Hill, who represents San Bruno, where the PG&E explosion killed eight, had already stated intention to break up the utility if Cal Fire blames the North Bay wildfires on PG&E negligence.
PG&E issued a press release in response to Cal Fire’s announcement, saying that the company still maintains that its “overall programs met our state’s high standards.” They also referred in the release to a “new normal” that requires new solutions. PG&E has already been the focus on more than 100 lawsuits related to the fires and some are speculating whether the utility can withstand the financial hit, if held responsible for additional fires, such as the Tubbs fire.
According to the report, Cal Fire’s investigations have been referred to the appropriate county District Attorney’s offices for review.
May 25, 2018
First Cal Fire Reports Released – Sonoma & Napa County Expected Soon
Cal Fire released a report today that found PG&E power lines were responsible for four Northern California wildfires in Butte and Nevada Counties last October. Investigations into three of those four fires found evidence that PG&E had violated Public Resources Code Section 4293 and may be held criminally liable for its failure to manage vegetation in proximity of the power lines they manage.
No official causes have been announced in the contemporaneous fires that devastated the North Bay region yet, including the Atlas, Tubbs, Nuns, Redwood Valley, Cascade, Sulphur and Pocket fires. Cal Fire is likely to announce those officials reports in the coming weeks. Like the Butte and Nevada County fires, many clues suggest that PG&E power lines and other equipment buffeted by heavy winds also caused or contributed to the most costly fire storm in California history.
On October 8, during a wind storm where gusts hit hurricane levels, several fires kicked up throughout the North Bay Region. More than 40 people died, hundreds were burned or injured, thousands were displaced, and over 10,000 homes and structures were lost. Soon after the fire, it became clear that there was no singular or dominant cause, and that it would take time to complete the investigation. But even in those early days, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that “power lines, like the ones laying amid burned braches and grass at some of the suspected origin points in Napa and Sonoma counties, can start fires in a variety of ways.”
Later, in February, The Press Democrat reported that “Santa Rosa city fire investigators have determined that PG&E power lines buffeted by heavy winds the night of Oct. 8 ignited at least two small fires in city neighborhoods”, and that “the fire damage to the site was a direct result of the high winds causing the power lines to arc, starting a fire in the combustible vegetation.” In March, the San Francisco Chronicle further reported that, “in the months since the fires erupted, no evidence has emerged in public pointing to any explanation other than power lines swaying, arcing and falling in the wind.”
Although a source for the fires in Sonoma and Napa Counties have not been announced yet, the likelihood that PG&E equipment and procedural failures caused most or all of the fires prompted thousands of lawsuits that have been consolidated into a coordinated litigation led by our firm, Walkup Melodia Kelly & Schoenberger, and the Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP and Robins Cloud LLP lawfirms. PG&E has a past history of failing to properly maintain its equipment, and siphoning away money from maintenance into profits. We suspect that PG&E is responsible for these fires, and we will know soon what Cal Fire determines caused them.
May 25, 2018
Liability Discovery Efforts Underway
Walkup Melodia, in association with our consortium partners, Abbey, Weitzenberg, et. al., Cotchett, Pitre, & McCarthy LLP, Panish Shea & Boyle LLP, Dreyer Babich Buccuola Wood Campora LLP, have started the process of obtaining information from PG&E through the discovery process. We have sent deposition notices and requests for production of documents and electronically stored information that we expect to contain millions of pages related to PG&E’s compliance and safety record. These records will show the degree with which PG&E complies with state liability law, published vegetation management plans and programs, and their own internal safety guidelines. Simultaneously, our experts and investigators are inspecting physical evidence collected in connection with the fires, and we are hard at work evaluating the impact and losses suffered by North Bay residents and businesses.
May 24, 2018
PG&E’s Bid to Avoid Inverse Condemnation Liability Rejected
On May 22, 2018, Superior Court Judge Curtis E.A. Karnow, the San Francisco-based trial judge overseeing the coordinated California North Bay Fires litigation, rejected PG&E’s plea to drop inverse condemnation liability claims – an important step on the path to fair compensation under constitutionally protected eminent domain principals.
PG&E’s lawyers argued that, “regardless of [even the] most egregious fault . . . unless PG&E has an absolute insurance policy from the CPUC, and is absolutely 100% guaranteed reimbursements, [victims] cannot have inverse condemnation.” However, the judge concluded that “it is not arbitrary or irrational to require a privately owned utility, which has been granted a monopoly or quasi-monopoly status by the state and which is authorized to pass its costs to its ratepayers upon satisfying a prudent manager standard, to pay property owners for the damages caused by its instrumentalities.”
Order Overruling PG&E’s Demurrers: Click here to read the court order.
March 29, 2018
PG&E Execs Get Millions In Bonuses While Seeking To Pay Homeowners Nothing
In mid-March we learned that PG&E was engaged in an expensive and comprehensive “backroom politics” campaign lobbying California state legislators to change current liability laws to immunize PG&E from responsibility in the North Bay firestorms. PG&E is seeking financial immunity from the state legislature, a change in the law of inverse condemnation, and the creation of liability hurdles to make it impossible for homeowners to be made whole.
The California Constitution provides that where a public utility takes property without just compensation, it is liable under the doctrine of inverse condemnation. PG&E is seeking to overturn that law.
PG&E went to Sacramento and floated an analogy to legislators that “if a drunk driver hits a utility pole, and the utility wire drops to the ground and starts a fire, then PG&E is unfairly liable for inverse condemnation”. That false premise struck a sympathetic chord with some legislators. But the analogy is wrong.
Although final reports of investigative agencies have not yet been issued, it is clear that the North Bay fires did not happen as the result of a drunk driver. The truth is that PG&E did not follow its own internal guidelines for line maintenance, recloser performance, vegetation management, and a host of other safety-related mandates. PG&E failed in its obligation to be safe.
March 13, 2018
SAN FRANCISCO: Wildfire Victim Advocates Attorneys Michael Kelly & Frank Pitre Named Co-Lead Counsel In California North Bay Fires Litigation
Wildfire Victim Advocates legal group proudly announces attorneys Michael Kelly of Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger and Frank Pitre of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP have been named as Co-Lead Counsel, representing thousands of individual plaintiffs filing lawsuits against Pacific Gas & Electric Company and PG&E Corporation as a result of the North Bay Fires. The appointment was made following the first case management hearing in San Francisco Superior Court on Tuesday, February 27 and signed by Judge Curtis E.A. Karnow on March 6, 2018.
“It is an honor to be placed in a position of such responsibility,” said Kelly. “The damage, loss and harm our friends and neighbors have endured as a result of the North Bay Fires has been catastrophic and we’re ready to get to work, moving the claims for damage from all of the PG&E originated fires to resolution. Our goal is justice for the victims and the survivors.”
Serving as Co-Lead Counsel with Kelly and Pitre is Bill Robins III of Robins Cloud LLP. Together, these three head a team of more than 30 firms who will be responsible for overseeing and coordinating all pretrial activities in the complex litigation, including the briefing, filing and arguing of motions, taking all discovery, as well as appearing before the court at all court ordered proceedings and presenting cases at trial for the individual plaintiffs.
Attorney Khaldoun Baghdadi with Walkup, Melodia, Kelly & Schoenberger and Wildfire Victim Advocates was also appointed to serve as Plaintiffs’ Co-Liaison Counsel along with Amy Eskin of Levin Simes LLP and Steven Skikos of Skikos, Crawford, Skikos & Joseph LLP. Their responsibilities include receiving and distributing orders, notices and correspondence from the court to plaintiffs’ counsel, as well as maintain and make available a complete set of all filed pleadings and orders filed and/or served in the coordinated proceedings.
In addition, Wildfire Victim Advocates attorneys Brian Panish and Rahul Ravipudi of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP, Steve Campora of Dreyer Babich Buccola Wood Campora LLP as well as Brendan M. Kunkle and Michael Green of Abbey, Weitzenberg, Warren & Emery have been named members of the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee. Members of this committee will, along with other responsibilities, coordinate pretrial activities and work performed by lead counsel and liaison counsel as well as call meetings and consult with individual Plaintiffs’ counsel on matters of common concern.
The North Bay Fires started when electrical equipment owned and maintained by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) came into contact with vegetation and/or other equipment owned and maintained by the utility, all because of PG&E’s alleged disregard of mandated safety practices and the foreseeable risks associated with failure to reasonably manage its infrastructure. As a result of the North Bay Fires, at least 43 people were killed, many others injured, more than 14,700 homes were destroyed and over 245,000 acres burned throughout California’s Wine County.
The Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding is being heard in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. (California North Bay Fire Cases (JCCP No. 4955))
If you or someone you love has been affected by the North Bay Fires – including the Tubbs, Atlas, Nuns, Oakmont, Adobe, Norrbom, Partrick, Redwood, Pressley, Sulphur and Pocket fires – please call our Wildfire Victim Advocates attorneys at (707) 658-4415 to schedule a free consultation and discuss your legal options.
Residents of Northern California, Including Santa Rosa, Napa, Sonoma & Calistoga
We are already representing clients throughout the fire ravaged counties. With our local partners in Santa Rosa the Walkup Law Firm Fire Litigation Team has filed lawsuits against Pacific Gas & Electric for injuries, damages and losses that have occurred in Sonoma County, Napa County, Solano County, Lake County and Mendocino County. The Walkup Wildfire Legal Team is representing victims who suffered personal injury, wrongful death, and substantial real property losses.
By Order dated January 4, 2018, all filed cases will be consolidated in a San Francisco Superior Court Judicial Council Coordinated proceeding (click here to read the court order). This includes all cases for clients who lost homes, businesses, ranchland, and undeveloped real property in Calistoga, Kenwood, Santa Rosa, Sonoma, Napa, Solano County, Mendocino, Lake County, Fountain Grove, Coffee Park and unincorporated areas throughout Napa County.
The Walkup Fire team represents, and/or has filed lawsuits on behalf of, clients who sustained burn injuries in the Tubbs Fire, Nuns Fire (includes Adobe, Norrbom, Pressley, Partrick, and Oakmont fires), Atlas Fire, Potter/Redwood Fire, Sulphur Fire, and Helena/Fork Fire. We have also filed wrongful death cases and we represent the survivors of people who died in the fires.
Beyond fire related injury and wrongful death lawsuits, we are honored to have been retained by property owners to recover on their behalf for emotional distress and uninsured financial losses to homes, wineries, growing crops, business structures, landscape, ranchland, and significant historic trees.
We are representing property owners who have lost property in the Tubbs Fire, Nuns Fire, Atlas Fire, Potter/Redwood Fire, Sulphur Fire, and Helena/Fork Fire.
Our team is working with clients to maximize their insurance policy recoveries while also advising them on dealing with issues surrounding the process of rebuilding or relocating, depending upon their needs.
If you, a friend or a family member, have sustained significant losses from the terrible October 2017 wildfires in Sonoma, Napa, Lake and Mendocino counties which will not be covered by insurance for such things as increased costs of construction, uncovered cost of rebuilding, uncovered losses of personal property, including items of special sentimental value, lost business opportunities, lost wages, and other financial losses, call the Northern California Wildfire Litigation Team at Walkup Melodia. Our team of lawyers is headed by managing partner Michael A. Kelly, partners Khaldoun Baghdadi, Doris Cheng, and Sara Peters and associate Andrew McDevitt, together with a supporting crew of dedicated paralegals and legal assistants.
We have a 60 year history of professionally serving our clients throughout the bay area. Our lawyers are consistently ranked by neutral rating services as the best of the best-check our ratings on BestLawyers.com and SuperLawyers.com. We recommend that potential clients check with lawyers and judges in Napa, Sonoma, Marin and San Francisco. Ask about our history track record ethics and integrity. Ask about our superior record of recovering money for our clients. Check out what our clients say about our professionalism and dedication on YELP. We are confident that clients who ask for referrals or confirmation from local lawyers and judges will be encouraged to work with our team.
LITIGATION UPDATES ON SELECTED WILDFIRES
WALKUP MELODIA MAP of PG&E INCIDENTS
WHY WALKUP MELODIA IS THE RIGHT FIRM FOR THESE CASES
When selecting a law firm to represent yourself and your family, you should choose a firm with experience, integrity and track record of success. The Walkup fire trial team has all those qualities. Members of the Walkup firm have close ties to the Sonoma and Napa valleys, with firm members and family members who have themselves sustained fire related losses in the October 2017 conflagration. We understand the issues that are confronting survivors including shock, vulnerability, emotional distress, loss of priceless personal property, loss of homes and businesses.
We have dealt with and sued insurance companies for more than 50 years. We have litigated against PG&E for more than 50 years. We understand the issues involved in preparing and trying cases that involve utility-caused electrical fires. We have been practicing in Northern California for more than half a century years and plan to be here for another 100 years. We understand the special relationship between attorney and client, and that for many clients the emotional distress that they have suffered as a result of their fire losses is more significant than the property losses.
Our initial consultation is free. We have structured our contingent legal fees to be lower than the majority of other firms advertising on radio or TV for clients.
If we cannot help you, or if we do not feel that you have a case we will tell you that. We will not file claims that do not have merit and we will not file claims on behalf of clients we do not believe will benefit from legal representation. Our ultimate goal is to try and restore our clients lives back to the condition they were in on October 7, 2017.
We understand how insurers think. We understand how to maximize your recovery.
Contact us online or call our firm at (415) 981-7210 for a free consultation with an attorney experienced in burn injury litigation.
“They were sensitive to our needs, professional in every manner, considerate, knowledgable, responsive, and quick to resolve our case out of court as well as secured a healthy settlement for us.” – Keith R.
Giving and Resources:
North Bay Fire Relief: https://www.redwoodcu.org/northbayfirerelief
Rebuild Wine Country: https://www.rebuildwinecountry.org/
Rebuild North Bay: https://www.rebuildnorthbay.org/
Salvation Army: http://deloro.salvationarmy.org/
The Napa Valley Community Foundation: click here.
American Red Cross Wildfire Relief Fund: click here.
Community Foundation of Sonoma: click here.
SHARE Emergency Housing: click here.
Sonoma County Animal Services: click here.
You Caring – Tubbs Fire Victims: click here.
BREAKING: The Walkup Fire Team is also representing victims of the Thomas Fire and mudslides in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties.